Middle East Chess Game

In a recent Op-Ed in The American Prospect, National Security Network Policy Director Ilan Goldenberg details the differences between the policies of both Bush Administrations and the Obama Administration in regards to foreign policy in the Middle East.  Contrary to Presidents George H.W. Bush and George W. Bush whose policies distanced the Middle East while actions taken in the early days of the Obama Presidency have expanded options. 

Rather than maximize flexibility, President George W. Bush’s Middle East policies boxed in the United States. The invasion of Iraq undermined U.S. credibility in the region, causing some of our closest allies to question both our intentions and competence. The reckless saber rattling toward Iran and Syria closed the door on cooperation on issues of common interest. Bush’s “war on terror” and his references to a “crusade” against terrorism convinced much of the world’s Muslim population that the United States was at war with Islam.”

The quick appointment ASP Board Member Senator George Mitchell to Middle East Envoyis another step in the right direction, according to Mr. Goldenberg.  He states “Mitchell’s subsequent two trips to the region, and Clinton’s trip to the Gaza donor conference in Egypt, have all sent the message that Middle East peace will be a top priority for the Obama administration.”

But the road forward will not be an easy one for the Obama Administration.  Mr. Goldenberg concludes that “…as in chess, the middle and end game will be much more complex than the opening. What matters is how your opponent — in this case, the various actors — responds and how you adjust.” 

Read Ilan Goldenberg’s column here.

Share on Facebook

Tweet